Case 2416805/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Miss M West v Airwair International Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 2416805/2018
- Decision date
- 17 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wardle Representation
- Venue
- Liverpool
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss M West
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 20 and 21 August 2019, Employment Judge Wardle recorded that the parties had agreed terms of settlement of the claim. The hearing was adjourned to allow those terms to be implemented, and the judgment did not contain any merits findings on the underlying complaints.
The order stated that if neither party applied to restore the matter to the hearing list by 18 September 2019, and with the claimant's consent given on 27 August 2019, the claim would be treated as withdrawn on settlement and dismissed without further order. No financial award or other remedy was recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The extracted judgment records agreed settlement terms and a contingent withdrawal/dismissal mechanism; it does not set out a merits decision or a claim-specific remedy. | Settled | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The extracted judgment records agreed settlement terms and a contingent withdrawal/dismissal mechanism; it does not set out a merits decision or a claim-specific remedy. | Settled | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.