Case 2416820/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Foulkes v Alliance Healthcare Management Services Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2416820/2018
- Decision date
- 8 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Holmes Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Foulkes
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that the claimant withdrew the claims. Following that withdrawal, the tribunal dismissed the proceedings.
The text provided contains no substantive findings on liability, no factual findings on the underlying allegations, and no remedy award.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Individual claim type inferred from the gov.uk listing categories and Layer 1 hint; the judgment text itself does not enumerate the withdrawn claims. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Redundancy | Individual claim type inferred from the gov.uk listing categories and Layer 1 hint; the judgment text itself does not enumerate the withdrawn claims. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | Individual claim type inferred from the gov.uk listing categories and Layer 1 hint; the judgment text itself does not enumerate the withdrawn claims. | Withdrawn | Sex | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Individual claim type inferred from the gov.uk listing categories and Layer 1 hint; the judgment text itself does not enumerate the withdrawn claims. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.