Case 2416824/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Miss H Owens Miss K Begum Miss E Jackson Miss S White v Zoe Kenworthy (Nature’s Nursery (Royton) Ltd) — 2019
- Case reference
- 2416824/2018
- Decision date
- 23 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Parkin
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss H Owens Miss K Begum Miss E Jackson Miss S White
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis judgment covered four joined cases brought by Miss H Owens, Miss K Begum, Miss E Jackson and Miss S White against Zoe Kenworthy (Nature's Nursery (Royton) Ltd). The tribunal record identifies case numbers 2416824/2018, 2400002/2019, 2401411/2019 and 2401777/2019, but the extracted text does not state the substantive type of claim for each case.
By a letter dated 4 June 2019, the tribunal gave the claimants an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, on why their claims should not be struck out because they were not being actively pursued. The tribunal recorded that the claimants did not make written representations, or did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The tribunal therefore struck out the claims.
The judgment is signed by Regional Employment Judge Parkin and is dated 20 August 2019, with the judgment sent to the parties on 23 August 2019. No monetary award or other remedy is recorded in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Case no. 2416824/2018 was struck out because the claimants did not make sufficient representations, or request a hearing, in response to the tribunal's letter dated 4 June 2019. The extracted judgment does not identify the substantive claim type. | Struck out | — | — |
| Other | Case no. 2400002/2019 was struck out because the claimants did not make sufficient representations, or request a hearing, in response to the tribunal's letter dated 4 June 2019. The extracted judgment does not identify the substantive claim type. | Struck out | — | — |
| Other | Case no. 2401411/2019 was struck out because the claimants did not make sufficient representations, or request a hearing, in response to the tribunal's letter dated 4 June 2019. The extracted judgment does not identify the substantive claim type. | Struck out | — | — |
| Other | Case no. 2401777/2019 was struck out because the claimants did not make sufficient representations, or request a hearing, in response to the tribunal's letter dated 4 June 2019. The extracted judgment does not identify the substantive claim type. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.