Case 2416860/2018 · Employment Tribunal
(1) Mr L Terry (2) Mrs M Rowlands v Knights Professional Services Limited and 2 others — 2020
- Case reference
- 2416860/2018
- Decision date
- 6 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Franey
Parties
4 namedClaimant
(1) Mr L Terry (2) Mrs M Rowlands
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn cases 2416860/2018 and 2416878/2018 against Knights Professional Services Limited, Turner Parkinson LLP and Knights Group Holdings Plc, the tribunal recorded that the proceedings were dismissed because the claimants withdrew their claims. The judgment does not set out any findings on the merits of the underlying disputes.
No liability findings, legal test application, or compensation calculation are recorded in the judgment text. There was therefore no remedy awarded and no split between heads of loss for the public record entry.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transfer of undertakings (TUPE) | The judgment records only that the proceedings were dismissed after the claimants withdrew their claims. The TUPE claim type is inferred from the GOV.UK listing categories, because the short judgment text does not spell out the underlying causes of action. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records only that the proceedings were dismissed after the claimants withdrew their claims. The unfair dismissal claim type is inferred from the GOV.UK listing categories, because the short judgment text does not spell out the underlying causes of action. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.