Case 2417003/2018 · Employment Tribunal

Mr I Bethel v B & H Precision Tooling and 1 other — 2019

Case reference: 2417003/2018
Decision date: 16 March 2019
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Sherratt

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

3 named

Claimant

Mr I Bethel

Respondents

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

This is a short procedural judgment in case 2417003/2018. Employment Judge Sherratt recorded that the First Respondent, B & H Precision Tooling, was dismissed from the proceedings. The judgment also states that the claims would proceed against the Second Respondent only, B&H. PT. Limited.

The extracted text does not include any substantive determination of the underlying employment claims, and it does not record any liability finding, legal reasoning on the merits, or monetary award. It only fixes the position of the parties for the continuation of the case and lists the further hearing dates as 3 and 4 July 2019.

The judgment was sent to the parties on 16 March 2019. No panel members are listed in the extracted text, and no discrimination characteristic, remedy figure, or legal test is identified in the document provided.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Other	This judgment is a procedural order only. It dismisses the First Respondent from the proceedings and records that the claims will proceed against the Second Respondent only on 3 and 4 July 2019. No substantive liability finding or remedy is stated in the extracted text.	Other	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.