Case 2417013/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Miss M Knowles v Manone Medical Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2417013/2018
- Decision date
- 7 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Robinson REPRESENTATION
- Venue
- Liverpool
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss M Knowles
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis judgment concerns a preliminary application by Miss M Knowles to add Mr David Marland as a further respondent. Employment Judge Robinson refused the application. The tribunal recorded that the full hearing was listed to start on 18 November 2019 for three days.
In refusing the application, the tribunal noted that the respondent's solicitor had agreed that Mr Marland would give evidence and that the respondent company would represent him, so any wrongdoing by him would be covered by the company. The tribunal accepted that Mr Marland was involved in the allegations made by the claimant, but said that if there were liability for his actions the company would deal with it through any compensation ordered. The claimant's point that the company might go into liquidation and dissolve was not treated as a sufficient reason to add him as a party.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The tribunal refused the claimant's application to add Mr David Marland as a further respondent. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.