Case 2417071/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Healey v The 600 Group — 2019
- Case reference
- 2417071/2018
- Decision date
- 7 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Feeney
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Healey
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 4 July 2019, the tribunal gave Mr M Healey an opportunity to make representations, or request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued. The judgment records that he failed to make written representations, or failed to make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
The tribunal therefore struck out the claim. The hearing listed for 8 October 2019 did not take place.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive cause(s) of action; it only records that 'the claim' was struck out because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.