Case 2417093/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Catlow v Burnley Leisure Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2417093/2019
- Decision date
- 3 August 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shotter
- Venue
- Liverpool
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Catlow
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr R Catlow brought a victimisation claim under section 27 of the Equality Act 2010 against Burnley Leisure Limited. The matter was heard by Employment Judge Shotter in Liverpool on 2 July 2020, by telephone, with Mr J Ellis appearing for the claimant and Mr G Vinton, CEO, appearing for the respondent.
The tribunal recorded that the victimisation claim was dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. No substantive findings on liability, facts in issue, or remedy were recorded in the judgment text supplied.
The decision therefore disposes of the claim on a procedural basis, and the judgment does not contain any monetary award or other remedy. No lay members were listed, and the hearing appears to have been before a judge alone.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Victimisation | The judgment states that the victimisation claim under section 27 of the Equality Act 2010 was dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.