Case 2417094/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Ms E Farrow v LTE Group — 2020
- Case reference
- 2417094/2018
- Decision date
- 3 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sherratt REPRESENTATION
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms E Farrow
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the unfair dismissal claim in case number 2417094/2018 was dismissed on withdrawal.
It also recorded that the Equality Act 2010 claims brought in both case numbers were dismissed because they had no reasonable prospect of success. The judgment note says reasons were given orally at the hearing, and no written reasons are included in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the unfair dismissal claim in case number 2417094/2018 was 'dismissed on withdrawal'. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states that the Equality Act 2010 claims brought in both cases were dismissed on the basis that they had no reasonable prospect of success. The extracted text does not specify the pleaded Equality Act cause of action beyond the listing category indicating disability discrimination. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 4 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.