Case 2417105/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Warhurst 1st v 2nd Respondent: AW Roofing Ltd Mr Samuel Anthony Warhurst — 2020
- Case reference
- 2417105/2019
- Decision date
- 7 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Buzzard Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Warhurst 1st
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dealt only with the second respondent. It stated that the claimant's claims against the second respondent were all dismissed because the claims were ones that could only be pursued against the claimant's employer.
The claimant had been given notice that the claims against the second respondent were proposed to be dismissed unless he objected by 27 May 2020. No objections were received, so the tribunal dismissed those claims.
The judgment expressly says that the claimant's claims against the first respondent, AW Roofing Ltd, were not affected by this decision. No remedy was awarded in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment dismisses the claimant's claims against the second respondent, Mr Samuel Anthony Warhurst / AW Roofing Ltd, because the claims were said to be claims that can only be pursued against the claimant's employer and no objection was received to the proposed dismissal by 27 May 2020. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.