Case 2417110/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Boulter v McLaughlin Contractors Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 2417110/2018
- Decision date
- 12 July 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Parkin Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Boulter
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment. The tribunal found that McLaughlin Contractors Ltd had failed to pay Mr C Boulter's holiday entitlement and ordered the respondent to pay him the gross sum of £1,928.66. No additional factual reasons or dispute analysis were set out in the extracted text.
The judgment also states that the hearing listed for 22 July 2019 was cancelled. A separate notice explained the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990, including that interest would run only if the sum remained unpaid 14 days after the written judgment was sent, but the extracted judgment does not quantify any interest award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Rule 21 judgment. The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of the gross sum of £1,928.66. No further reasons were set out in the extracted text. | Upheld | — | £1,929 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,929
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.