Case 2417197/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v WMB Installations Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 2417197/2018
- Decision date
- 4 March 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tom Ryan
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was decided by Employment Judge Tom Ryan in the Employment Tribunal at Manchester on 21 February 2019. The respondent, WMB Installations Ltd, had failed to present a response within the time prescribed by rule 16 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013, and the tribunal therefore entered judgment for the claimant, Mr W Jones, on his complaints of unfair dismissal and wrongful dismissal.
The judgment records that both complaints were well-founded. No separate liability reasoning, findings on the dismissal facts, or legal test were set out in the extracted text. The tribunal stated that remedy would be determined at a later hearing listed for 3 April 2019, so no award was made in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Respondent failed to present a response within the time prescribed by rule 16 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013. | Upheld | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | Respondent failed to present a response within the time prescribed by rule 16 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.