Case 2417285/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr I Wilkinson v Wharton Conservative Club — 2019
- Case reference
- 2417285/2018
- Decision date
- 2 February 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shotter JUDGMENT
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr I Wilkinson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn this Rule 21 judgment, Employment Judge Shotter recorded that Mr I Wilkinson’s claims against Wharton Conservative Club succeeded. The tribunal found that the claimant was unfairly dismissed, that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages, that the dismissal was in breach of contract in respect of notice, and that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement.
The judgment does not set out detailed findings or reasons in the extracted text, but it records that the claim succeeded in full. Remedy was not determined in the judgment itself and was left to a Remedy Hearing listed for 11 April 2019.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states this was in respect of notice. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states the respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.