Case 2417311/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Simon Driscoll Consultancy Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2417311/2018
- Decision date
- 17 June 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Robert Gall
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case called for hearing in Glasgow on 5 June 2019. All three claimants were present; the respondents were not present and had not lodged an ET3, so the hearing proceeded undefended. The tribunal had earlier explained the position on late presentation of an ET3, but none was filed. It heard evidence from Mr Thompson, Mrs Cameron and Ms Laing, and found them credible and reliable. Their evidence was supported by contracts, bank statements, termination correspondence and payslips where available.
Mr Thompson was found not to have been paid for the period he worked in November 2018. The tribunal calculated his pro rata wages at £3,972.22 gross and ordered that sum to be paid. It also found that he resigned on one month’s notice, that the respondents accepted the resignation with immediate effect, and that this amounted to dismissal. Because no notice pay was paid, he was awarded £1,057.69 gross, which the tribunal described as a breach of contract.
Mrs Cameron was found to have worked in November 2018 without receiving payment for that month, and the tribunal awarded her £1,554.60 gross. Ms Laing was found to have worked for a short period and then resigned. A letter confirming acceptance of her resignation also recorded sums due to her, and the tribunal accepted that Mr Thompson, who signed the letter as chief operating officer, had authority to do so. Ms Laing was awarded £2,500 gross wages, £16.67 for mobile phone charges and £118.83 in commission. The total sums ordered paid were £9,220.01 gross.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Mr Thompson: unpaid wages for work in November 2018. The judgment awards £3,972.22 gross; the cause of action is not separately labelled in the reasons, so this is mapped to unlawful deduction from wages. | Upheld | — | £3,972 |
| Breach of contract | Mr Thompson: one month’s notice pay after he resigned and the respondents accepted the resignation with immediate effect. The judgment expressly says the failure to pay this sum was a breach of contract. | Upheld | — | £1,058 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Mrs Cameron: unpaid wages for November 2018. The judgment awards £1,554.60 gross; the reasons do not separately label the legal basis, so this is mapped to unlawful deduction from wages. | Upheld | — | £1,555 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Ms Laing: pro rata salary for a short period of work. The judgment awards £2,500 gross and does not separately label the legal basis, so this is mapped to unlawful deduction from wages. | Upheld | — | £2,500 |
| Breach of contract | Ms Laing: reimbursement of mobile phone charges. The sum is recorded in the resignation-acceptance letter the tribunal accepted as authorised by Mr Thompson. | Upheld | — | £17 |
| Breach of contract |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £9,220
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.