Case 2417323/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Ms R Harvey v Equilibrium Healthcare Group Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2417323/2018
- Decision date
- 19 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Parkin
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms R Harvey
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment is a short withdrawal order. It states that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The judgment is signed by Regional Employment Judge Parkin and is dated 23 August 2019; it was sent to the parties on 19 September 2019.
The GOV.UK decision page records the jurisdiction code as Health & Safety, Public Interest Disclosure and Unfair Dismissal. The extracted judgment does not set out the pleaded allegations, evidence, legal reasoning, findings on liability, or any monetary remedy.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The GOV.UK decision page records the jurisdiction code as including Health & Safety. The short judgment itself does not set out separate particulars for this head of claim, so it has been classified conservatively as other. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | Mapped from the GOV.UK jurisdiction code entry for Public Interest Disclosure. The short judgment does not set out the pleaded facts or distinguish this head of claim from the others. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Mapped from the GOV.UK jurisdiction code entry for Unfair Dismissal. The judgment does not set out any merits findings and states only that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.