Case 2417369/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Healey v Millennium Medical Products Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2417369/2020
- Decision date
- 6 April 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Holbrook REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Healey
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that Mr R Healey’s claim for unfair dismissal succeeded against Millennium Medical Products Limited. It ordered the respondent to pay a total monetary award of £3,764.75.
That award was divided into a basic award of £2,084.75 and a compensatory award of £1,680.00. The judgment also applied the Employment Protection (Recoupment of Benefits) Regulations 1996, recording a prescribed element of £1,680.00 attributable to 8 June 2020 to 14 September 2020, with the balance of the award above that figure being £2,084.75. The separate notice under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 recorded that the stipulated rate of interest was 8%, but no separate interest sum was set out in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal awarded a total monetary award of £3,764.75 for unfair dismissal, made up of a basic award of £2,084.75 and a compensatory award of £1,680.00. | Upheld | — | £3,765 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,765
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £2,085
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £1,680
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.