Case 2417397/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss J Malcharczyk v Vivid Lounge Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2417397/2020
- Decision date
- 1 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Holmes Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss J Malcharczyk
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which the time for presenting a response had expired and the respondent had not presented a valid response within the prescribed time limit. On that basis, the tribunal entered judgment without a contested hearing.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages. It ordered Vivid Lounge Limited to pay Miss J Malcharczyk the gross sum of £663.25.
The judgment does not set out any separate remedy breakdown beyond the gross award, and the attached notice explains only the general position on statutory interest if the sum remains unpaid after 14 days from the relevant decision day.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment entered because the respondent did not present a valid response within the prescribed time limit. | Upheld | — | £663 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £663
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.