Case 2417401/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Z Waring v Golden Egg Group Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2417401/2020
- Decision date
- 12 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ross REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Z Waring
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent failed to file a response and did not attend the hearing, so its participation was limited to the extent permitted by the Employment Judge. The claimant, Miss Z Waring, appeared in person at the Manchester CVP hearing on 11 October 2021. The tribunal recorded that reasons had been given orally, and the written judgment stated the reasons would not be provided unless requested.
The tribunal upheld the claimant’s complaint that her dismissal was pregnancy related discrimination under section 18 of the Equality Act 2010. It described that claim as well-founded and ordered the respondent to pay £10,000 for injury to feelings.
The tribunal also upheld the claimant’s claim for unpaid wages, awarding three weeks’ net wages totalling £993. It further upheld the claim for accrued but untaken holiday on termination of employment and awarded six days’ gross pay, calculated at £74.60 per day, totalling £446.40.
The judgment states that the total sum payable by the respondent within 14 days was £11,439.40.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | The tribunal found the claimant’s dismissal was pregnancy related discrimination under section 18 Equality Act 2010 and awarded £10,000 for injury to feelings. | Upheld | Pregnancy and maternity | £10,000 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claimant succeeded on her unpaid wages claim and was awarded three weeks’ net wages, calculated as 3 x £331. | Upheld | — | £993 |
| Holiday pay | The claimant succeeded on her claim for accrued but untaken holiday on termination and was awarded six days’ gross pay at £74.60 per day. | Upheld | — | £446 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £11,439
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.