Case 2417482/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Laska v PJ Southport Limited t/a Papa John's — 2022
- Case reference
- 2417482/2020
- Decision date
- 7 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Franey
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Laska
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy letter dated 23 September 2022, the Tribunal gave the respondent an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing to do so, on why its response should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued. The respondent failed to reply.
The Tribunal therefore struck out the response. The judgment did not determine the merits of the underlying claims or any remedy. It recorded only that the respondent would be entitled to notice of any hearings and decisions, but would be entitled to participate in a hearing only to the extent permitted by the Employment Judge.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The Tribunal struck out the respondent's response after giving it an opportunity by letter dated 23 September 2022 to make representations or request a hearing on why the response should not be struck out for not being actively pursued. This judgment did not determine the merits of the underlying claims. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.