Case 2417511/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N Vasi Mr R Pearson v Mr Mark Dinsdale — 2021
- Case reference
- 2417511/2020
- Decision date
- 3 December 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Benson Representatives
- Venue
- Liverpool
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr N Vasi Mr R Pearson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing in Liverpool on 17 November 2021 before Employment Judge Benson, the claimants, Mr N Vasi and Mr R Pearson, did not attend. The respondent, Mr Mark Dinsdale, was represented by Ms A Beattie. The tribunal had previously listed the matter for a preliminary hearing on 5 October 2021, when neither claimant attended. On that date Employment Judge Aspinall issued an order warning that the tribunal was considering strike out because the claims had not been actively pursued, required the claimants to notify the tribunal if they wished to continue, and to provide updated contact details.
The claimants did not comply with that order and did not contact either the tribunal or the respondent. They also did not attend the 17 November 2021 hearing. The tribunal found that the complaints had not been actively pursued and struck out all complaints under rule 37. No monetary remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying complaint(s); all complaints in case numbers 2417511/2020 and 2417512/2020 were struck out under rule 37 after non-attendance and failure to comply with the tribunal's order. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.