Case 2417518/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Kovac v Longmoor AG Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2417518/2020
- Decision date
- 8 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Porter Representation
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Kovac
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Mr Kovac was employed by Longmoor AG Limited until the effective date of termination on 31 July 2020. It upheld his claim for unlawful deduction from wages and ordered the respondent to pay £2,295.66 gross. It dismissed his separate claim for accrued holiday pay on termination of employment.
The tribunal also found that the respondent breached the terms of the contract of employment by failing to pay outstanding fuel expenses. It ordered the respondent to pay £52.50 compensation in respect of that breach. The respondent's counterclaim was dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unlawful deduction from wages and ordered the respondent to pay £2,295.66 gross. | Upheld | — | £2,296 |
| Holiday pay | The claim for accrued holiday pay on termination of employment was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found a breach of contract in failing to pay outstanding fuel expenses and ordered £52.50 compensation. | Upheld | — | £53 |
| Other | The respondent's counterclaim was unsuccessful and dismissed; the extracted text does not specify its precise legal basis. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,348
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.