Case 2417620/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss H Dean v Everything Transport Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2417620/2020
- Decision date
- 12 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cronshaw Representation
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss H Dean
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss H Dean’s complaint of unauthorised deductions from pay against Everything Transport Ltd was found well founded at the hearing on 5 May 2021 before Employment Judge Cronshaw. The respondent did not attend. The tribunal made a judgment for the gross sum of £2,046.95, described as the amount unlawfully deducted.
The hearing was conducted remotely by audio conference using the Tribunal’s CVP video platform because of Covid-19 restrictions. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. The judgment does not record any further findings beyond the unlawful deductions claim or any split of the award into separate heads.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal described the complaint as one of unauthorised deductions from pay and found it well founded. Judgment was entered in the gross sum of £2,046.95, described as the amount unlawfully deducted. | Upheld | — | £2,047 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,047
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.