Case 2417718/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr David Murray v GCS Support Services Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2417718/2020
- Decision date
- 18 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr David Murray
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting alone, heard the case at Manchester Tribunal by CVP on 10, 11 and 12 January 2022. The claimant was Mr David Murray and the respondent was GCS Support Services Limited. No written reasons were issued because reasons were given orally at the hearing and no request for written reasons was made within the relevant time.
The only adjudicated claim recorded in the judgment was unfair dismissal. The tribunal found that the complaint was not well-founded and expressly held that it was not upheld. No other claims, liability findings, or remedy awards are recorded in the written judgment extract.
The judgment does not set out the tribunal's detailed reasoning in writing, so the extracted record is limited to the formal outcome. No compensation, basic award, interest, or other monetary award is recorded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal stated that the complaint of unfair dismissal was not well-founded and was not upheld. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.