Case 2417893/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Thompson v Mitie Security Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2417893/2018
- Decision date
- 23 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Parkin
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T Thompson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed after the claimant withdrew the claim. It does not set out findings on liability, facts, or remedy.
No monetary award or remedy is recorded. No discrimination claim or protected characteristic is identified in the judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment dismisses the proceedings following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The specific individual claims are not itemised in the judgment text; classification follows the listing category as a likely claim type. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment dismisses the proceedings following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The specific individual claims are not itemised in the judgment text; classification follows the listing category as a likely claim type. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment dismisses the proceedings following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The specific individual claims are not itemised in the judgment text; classification follows the listing category as a likely claim type. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment dismisses the proceedings following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The specific individual claims are not itemised in the judgment text; classification follows the listing category as a likely claim type. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.