Case 2417929/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Swinton and others (see schedule attached) v Pinewood Repro Limited (In Administration) — 2019
- Case reference
- 2417929/2018
- Decision date
- 19 June 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Franey
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Swinton and others (see schedule attached)
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal determined the claims for a protective award under Rule 21 without a hearing. It held that the protective award claims succeeded and made a protective award in respect of each individual claimant listed on the attached schedule. The award required the respondent to pay remuneration for the protected period of 90 days beginning on 5 December 2018.
The judgment also states that the recoupment regulations apply. It does not set out any individual monetary figures in the extracted text, and the schedule with the claimant-specific amounts is not included in the extraction provided here.
Separately, the Tribunal ordered that all claims for notice pay, unlawful deductions from pay, and redundancy payment remain stayed, and said claimants with such claims were free to withdraw them. The hearing listed for 1 July 2019 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Protective award under the collective redundancy provisions; the judgment does not use a taxonomy-mapped claim type. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.