Case 2417935/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Tyrell v Servico Ind Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 2417935/2018
- Decision date
- 1 April 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Parkin Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Tyrell
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which the tribunal determined the claim on the papers. It found that Servico Ind Ltd had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages in respect of overtime and November hours. The tribunal ordered payment of the gross sums of £289.71 and £705.56, making £996.27 in total for that claim.
The tribunal also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice. It awarded damages in the net sum of £313.20 for that breach of contract claim. No separate reasons beyond the orders appear in the extracted judgment.
The judgment includes the standard interest notice under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990, stating that unpaid sums would carry interest if not paid within 14 days after the judgment was sent on 1 April 2019, with interest accruing from 2 April 2019 at 8%.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of the gross sums of £289.71 for overtime and £705.56 for November hours, totalling £996.27. | Upheld | — | £996 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages in the net sum of £313.20. | Upheld | — | £313 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,309
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.