Case 2417946/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Clarkson v Dalziel Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2417946/2020
- Decision date
- 5 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Franey
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Clarkson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment covers case numbers 2417946/2020 and 2418137/2020 between Mr D Clarkson and Dalziel Limited. By letter dated 12 August 2022, the tribunal warned the claimant that his claim might be struck out because he had not complied with the tribunal order to serve a witness statement and because the claim was not being actively pursued. He was given until 26 August 2022 either to object or to request a hearing to make representations, but he did not respond.
Accordingly, Employment Judge Franey struck out the claim under rule 37 because it had not been actively pursued and the proceedings were at an end. The final hearing listed for 5 to 7 September 2022 was cancelled. The judgment contains no merits findings and records no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive cause of action. It records that case numbers 2417946/2020 and 2418137/2020 were struck out because the claim had not been actively pursued and the claimant had not complied with the order to serve a witness statement. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.