Case 2417972/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Perfetti Guzman v Rosato Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2417972/2020
- Decision date
- 7 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rice-Birchall REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Perfetti Guzman
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard remotely by CVP at Manchester on 23 March 2021 and 1 July 2021 before Employment Judge Rice-Birchall. The claimant, Mr J Perfetti Guzman, appeared in person and the respondent, Rosato Limited, was represented by a solicitor.
The written judgment records that the claimant's claims of unlawful deduction from wages and/or breach of contract failed and were dismissed. No monetary award is recorded in the decision.
The judgment also notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the written record of the decision. The extracted text does not set out the tribunal's detailed reasoning beyond the dismissal of the claims.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the claimant's claim of unlawful deduction from wages failed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the claimant's claim of breach of contract failed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.