Case 2418049/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M. Kiyoyo v Swissport GB Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2418049/2018
- Decision date
- 6 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Massarella
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M. Kiyoyo
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment states that the parties agreed terms of settlement. It records that the claimant's claims were dismissed on withdrawal under Rule 52 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
The tribunal did not determine the substantive merits of the claims in this judgment, and no factual findings or remedy award were made.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment records that the claimant's claims were dismissed on withdrawal following settlement. The specific claims are not identified in the judgment text; this classification follows the gov.uk listing categories and should be treated with caution. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records that the claimant's claims were dismissed on withdrawal following settlement. The specific claims are not identified in the judgment text; this classification follows the gov.uk listing categories and should be treated with caution. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment records that the claimant's claims were dismissed on withdrawal following settlement. The specific claims are not identified in the judgment text; this classification follows the gov.uk listing categories and should be treated with caution. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52, Sch.1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.