Case 2418090/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs L Rowlands v J M Recruitment Education and Training Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 2418090/2018
- Decision date
- 20 May 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Horne REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs L Rowlands
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing before Employment Judge Horne at Liverpool on 13 May 2019. The claimant, Mrs L Rowlands, appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Mr D Brown, solicitor. The judgment recorded that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
The complaint of unlawful deduction from wages was dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant. No monetary award was made on that complaint.
The complaint of unfair constructive dismissal, as originally contained in the claim form, was struck out because the tribunal had no jurisdiction to consider it. The judgment also granted permission for the claimant to amend her claim so as to re-introduce a complaint of unfair constructive dismissal now that her employment had terminated, with the basis to be as set out in the separate case management order.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the complaint was dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Constructive dismissal | The judgment refers to the complaint of unfair constructive dismissal and says it was struck out because the tribunal had no jurisdiction to consider it. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.