Case 2418124/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr W Robinson v Arranged Musical Options Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2418124/2020
- Decision date
- 15 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Leach Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr W Robinson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn this Rule 21 judgment, Employment Judge Leach determined three monetary claims in favour of Mr W Robinson against Arranged Musical Options Limited. The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of £52.44, found dismissal in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages of £262.20, and found that holiday entitlement had not been paid and ordered payment of £381.76. Each sum was stated to be less any tax payable.
The judgment also recorded that the hearing listed for 19 March 2021 was cancelled. The accompanying notice explained the tribunal’s interest regime under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990, including that unpaid sums may carry interest if not paid within 14 days of the relevant decision day, but the judgment itself did not quantify any interest award.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal ordered payment of £52.44 as an unauthorised deduction from wages, stated as gross/net less any tax payable. | Upheld | — | £52 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages of £262.20 less any tax payable. | Upheld | — | £262 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £381.76 less any tax payable. | Upheld | — | £382 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £696
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.