Case 2418223/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Ward v C K Electrical & Mechanical (North West) Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2418223/2020
- Decision date
- 22 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McDonald
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Ward
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Manchester by CVP on 17 March 2021, Employment Judge McDonald, sitting alone, entered judgment by consent in favour of Mr G Ward against C K Electrical & Mechanical (North West) Ltd. The tribunal recorded that the claimant was entitled to a redundancy payment of £1,614, unpaid holiday pay of £572, and payment of notice pay and wages of £2,652.
The judgment states that the holiday pay and notice pay figures were gross, with the respondent to account to HMRC for any deductions for tax and national insurance before paying the net balance. The redundancy payment was to be paid gross to the claimant. The sums awarded total £4,838.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Judgment by consent; the tribunal recorded entitlement to a redundancy payment. | Settled | — | £1,614 |
| Holiday pay | Judgment by consent; the tribunal recorded entitlement to unpaid holiday pay. | Settled | — | £572 |
| Breach of contract | Judgment by consent; the tribunal recorded entitlement to notice pay and wages as a single sum. | Settled | — | £2,652 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,838
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.