Case 2418294/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Sharpe v Office for National Statistics — 2021
- Case reference
- 2418294/2020
- Decision date
- 25 August 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Horne Representatives
- Venue
- Liverpool
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Sharpe
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment concerned claims brought by Mr P Sharpe against the Office for National Statistics. The tribunal addressed complaints of disability discrimination identified in a case management order, together with complaints of unlawful deduction from wages, breach of the Working Time Regulations 1998, and a claim for damages for breach of contract.
For the disability discrimination complaints, the tribunal recorded that allegations 17 to 23 had been raised in the claim forms and did not require amendment, and that allegation 24 also did not require amendment because claim 2401010/2010, read as a whole, could reasonably be understood as including it. The remaining disability discrimination complaints required an amendment, and permission to amend was refused.
The tribunal held that it had no jurisdiction to consider the unlawful deduction from wages complaint, the Working Time Regulations complaint, or the breach of contract damages claim. It found that those complaints had been presented after the expiry of the statutory time limit, that it was reasonably practicable for them to have been presented in time, and that in any event they had not been presented within such further period as the tribunal considered reasonable.
The tribunal also held that it had no jurisdiction to consider disability discrimination allegations 17 to 24 because they were presented after the expiry of the statutory time limit and the claimant did not present them within such other period as the tribunal considered just and equitable. The claims were therefore dismissed. No monetary remedy was recorded.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Allegations 17 to 24 were dismissed because the tribunal had no jurisdiction: they were presented after the expiry of the statutory time limit and were not presented within such other period as the tribunal considered just and equitable. Remaining disability discrimination complaints required an amendment and permission to amend was refused. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed because the tribunal had no jurisdiction: the complaint was presented after the expiry of the statutory time limit, it was reasonably practicable to present it in time, and it was not presented within such further period as the tribunal considered reasonable. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Working time regulations | Dismissed because the tribunal had no jurisdiction to consider the complaint of breach of the Working Time Regulations 1998 on time-limit grounds. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Dismissed because the tribunal had no jurisdiction to consider the claim for damages for breach of contract on time-limit grounds. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- reasonably practicable
- just and equitable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.