Case 2418366/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms L Maloney v Blackrod Holdings Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2418366/2020
- Decision date
- 26 August 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Holmes Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms L Maloney
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was determined under Rule 21 because the time for presenting a response had expired and no valid response had been filed by the respondent within the prescribed time limit. On that basis, the tribunal entered judgment without a contested hearing on the evidence.
The tribunal held that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages. It ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £592.96 in respect of that claim.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. It ordered payment of the gross sum of £494.13 for that element.
The judgment states that the respondent must pay the gross sums subject to any appropriate deductions for tax and national insurance, if applicable, with accounting to HMRC. The notice on interest records the relevant judgment day as 26 August 2021, the calculation day as 27 August 2021, and the stipulated interest rate as 8%, but no separate interest figure is stated in the judgment text provided.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £592.96. | Upheld | — | £593 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of the gross sum of £494.13. | Upheld | — | £494 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,087
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.