Case 2418370/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms K Emmans v Blackrod Holdings Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2418370/2020
- Decision date
- 27 August 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Holmes Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms K Emmans
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal issued a Rule 21 judgment because the time for presenting a response had expired and no valid response had been presented by the respondent. On that basis, Employment Judge Holmes found that Blackrod Holdings Limited had failed to pay Ms K Emmans’s holiday entitlement.
The judgment ordered the respondent to pay a gross sum of £1,098.72. It also recorded a net sum of £857.00, which was the amount ordered to be paid to the claimant, and directed the respondent to account to HMRC for the tax and national insurance due on that sum. The accompanying notice stated that interest would apply under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 if the award remained unpaid after the relevant decision day.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Rule 21 judgment; no valid response was presented. The tribunal found the respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. The judgment states a gross sum of £1,098.72 and a net sum of £857.00 payable to the claimant, with tax and national insurance to be accounted for to HMRC. | Upheld | — | £1,099 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,099
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.