Case 2418404/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Irons & 6 Others (see schedule) v Blue Group UK Retail Limited T/A Harveys Furniture (In Administration) — 2022
- Case reference
- 2418404/2020
- Decision date
- 7 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Malik Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Irons & 6 Others (see schedule)
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dealt with a Rule 21 judgment because the respondent presented no response. It found that the claimants listed in the schedule were employed by Blue Group UK Retail Limited T/A Harveys Furniture (in Administration) and were dismissed by reason of redundancy on 18 August 2020. The respondent employed more than 20 employees and nearly all were made redundant on or around the same date.
The tribunal found there had been no proper warning, notice, or consultation with the workforce, and that the dismissals were implemented without consultation or advance notice. It held that the respondent did not adequately comply with section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 and, under section 189(1)(d), (2), (3) and (4), made a protective award in favour of the claimants listed in the attached schedule for a protected period of 90 days beginning on 18 August 2020.
The judgment records that this was a two-stage process and that no financial awards were made at this stage. The tribunal noted that the claimants would later need to seek payment of individual awards, and that any dispute about payment would be dealt with separately under section 192 of the 1992 Act. The Employment Protection (Recoupment of Jobseeker's Allowance and Income Support) Regulations 1996 were stated to apply.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade union | The tribunal found a breach of section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 and made a protective award in favour of the claimants listed in the schedule. The note to the judgment records that this was stage one only, with no financial award quantified at that stage; individual claimants would later seek payment under section 192 if needed. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
5 references- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- section 188 TULRCA 1992
- section 189 TULRCA 1992
- section 192 TULRCA 1992
- Employment Protection (Recoupment of Jobseeker's Allowance and Income Support) Regulations 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.