Case 2418429/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs D Garrett v Ashley’s Cakes Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2418429/2020
- Decision date
- 8 April 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs D Garrett
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 18 March 2021, Employment Judge Phil Allen entered a Rule 21 judgment in favour of Mrs D Garrett against Ashley's Cakes Limited. The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of £244.16 gross. It also found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £1,395.02 in damages.
The tribunal further found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and awarded a statutory redundancy payment of £2,092.08. It also found that the respondent had failed to pay holiday entitlement and ordered £418.56. The total award was £4,149.82. The notice attached to the judgment states that interest may accrue on unpaid sums if they remain unpaid 14 days after the relevant decision day of 8 April 2021, but no separate interest figure is set out in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal ordered payment of the gross sum of £244.16 for an unauthorised deduction from wages. | Upheld | — | £244 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice, and awarded £1,395.02 in damages. | Upheld | — | £1,395 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and awarded a redundancy payment of £2,092.08. | Upheld | — | £2,092 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £418.56. | Upheld | — | £419 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,150
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.