Case 2418465/2020 · Employment Tribunal
M Bankowski v Creamline Dairies Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2418465/2020
- Decision date
- 25 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Batten
Parties
2 namedClaimant
M Bankowski
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy letter dated 1 December 2021, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out. The stated reasons were that the claimant had failed to comply with case management orders made on 9 July 2021 and that it appeared the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Batten struck out the claim. The hearing listed for 27 and 28 January 2022 was cancelled.
The judgment does not determine the substantive merits of any underlying employment complaint and records no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The tribunal struck out the claim after a letter dated 1 December 2021 gave the claimant an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out for failure to comply with case management orders made on 9 July 2021 and because it appeared not to have been actively pursued. The claimant did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.