Case 2418501/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Kilshaw v Lunar Automotive Limited (in compulsory liquidation) — 2021
- Case reference
- 2418501/2020
- Decision date
- 9 December 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Slater
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Kilshaw
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal entered a Rule 21 judgment that the respondent made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages by not paying wages at 80% of normal pay for the period 1 September 2020 to 23 October 2020 inclusive. The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant the gross sum of £2,840.64.
The tribunal also found that the respondent made an unauthorised deduction from wages by failing to pay the claimant in lieu of 9 days' accrued but untaken holiday on termination of employment. The respondent was ordered to pay the gross sum of £840.96. The judgment stated that other complaints would be addressed in a further paper judgment or at a final hearing if any time limit or other outstanding issue remained to be decided.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment for unpaid wages at 80% of normal pay for 1 September 2020 to 23 October 2020 inclusive. | Upheld | — | £2,841 |
| Holiday pay | Rule 21 judgment for payment in lieu of 9 days' accrued but untaken holiday on termination of employment. | Upheld | — | £841 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,682
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 - Rule 21
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.