Case 2418505/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S McGowan v Chung Wang Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2418505/2020
- Decision date
- 24 June 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Johnson Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S McGowan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal entered a Rule 21 judgment in favour of Mr S McGowan against Chung Wang Limited. It upheld his claims for unlawful deduction from wages, unpaid annual leave entitlement, and notice pay, and ordered the respondent to pay £3,228.36 in total. The judgment broke that sum down as £1,466.28 for unlawful deduction from wages, £657.60 for unpaid annual leave entitlement, and £1,104.48 for notice pay.
The judgment also recorded that the claimant's remaining claims would be considered at a Preliminary Hearing before a judge sitting alone, listed for two hours on a date to be advised. The judgment was sent to the parties on 24 June 2021, and the attached interest notice stated the tribunal's standard position on interest if sums remain unpaid after 14 days, but no separate interest amount was set out in the judgment itself.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records that the claimant's claim of unlawful deduction from wages succeeded under Rule 21. | Upheld | — | £1,466 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment records this as unpaid annual leave entitlement and awards £657.60. | Upheld | — | £658 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment records this as notice pay and awards £1,104.48. | Upheld | — | £1,104 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,228
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.