Case 2418522/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Kinsella v Glitterati Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2418522/2020
- Decision date
- 19 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Benson Representation
- Venue
- Liverpool
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S Kinsella
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Liverpool on 15 November 2021, Employment Judge Benson heard Miss S Kinsella’s claims against Glitterati Limited. The tribunal dismissed the automatic unfair dismissal claim.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £1,783.61. It also found that the respondent had failed to give the claimant an itemised pay statement.
The judgment records that the unnotified deductions from 6 April 2020 to 2 November 2020 equated to the same figure already ordered, so no further payment was made on that issue.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal dismissed the automatic unfair dismissal claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered the gross sum of £1,783.61. | Upheld | — | £1,784 |
| Other | The tribunal found that the respondent failed to give the claimant an itemised pay statement, but recorded that the unnotified deductions from 6 April 2020 to 2 November 2020 equated to the sum already ordered, so no further payment was made. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,784
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.