Case 2418527/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Quansoon v Cakista Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2418527/2020
- Decision date
- 28 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Slater Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Quansoon
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 28 March 2022 the tribunal sent orders giving the claimant an opportunity to make written representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued. The claimant did not make written representations and did not request a hearing.
The tribunal therefore struck out the claim. The extracted text does not identify any substantive merits findings, and it does not record any monetary award or remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment does not specify the underlying claim type(s); it states only that 'the claim' was struck out for not being actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.