Case 2418759/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms C Cranshaw v Lunar Automotive Limited (in compulsory liquidation) — 2021
- Case reference
- 2418759/2020
- Decision date
- 8 October 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Slater
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms C Cranshaw
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal entered judgment under Rule 60 on the basis of admissions in the response. It found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages by not paying wages at the rate of 80% of normal pay for the period 1 September 2020 to 4 December 2020 inclusive.
The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant the gross sum of £5,359.08. The judgment stated that complaints about deduction of employee pension contributions and underpayment for holiday taken during furlough would be addressed by a further paper judgment or at a final hearing if any outstanding issue, including time limits, remained to be decided.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Judgment was entered on the basis of admissions in the response for unpaid wages at 80% of normal pay from 1 September 2020 to 4 December 2020 inclusive. Complaints about deduction of employee pension contributions and underpayment for holiday taken during furlough were reserved for a further judgment on paper or final hearing and are not treated here as adjudicated claims. | Upheld | — | £5,359 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,359
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 - Rule 60
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.