Case 2419455/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms A Yewdall v Rest Assured Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2419455/2020
- Decision date
- 13 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Holmes Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms A Yewdall
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningFollowing the postponement of the hearing on 31 March 2021, the tribunal issued judgment on two matters that were ready for determination. It accepted that the respondent did not dispute the claimant's entitlement to £764.73 as wages properly due but unpaid, and ordered that sum to be paid as an unlawful deduction from wages. The tribunal stated that the sum was net and should be paid without deduction of tax or national insurance, in line with the payslip of 31 October 2020.
The tribunal also dealt with the claimant's one week's notice pay claim. The respondent's argument that she was not entitled to notice pay because she had not completed probation was found to have no reasonable prospects of success and was struck out under rule 37(1). The tribunal therefore held that the claim succeeded. Having seen a signed employment contract dated 27 July 2020 showing an annual salary of £16,000, the tribunal rejected the claimant's figure of £316.44 based on a 36-hour week and instead assessed one week's pay at £307.69 by dividing the annual salary by 52.
The remaining claims were not determined in this judgment and were listed to be heard on 23 June 2021. The reasons note that those remaining issues related to holiday pay and bonus, with further disclosure and witness statements to be prepared. The judgment also contained the standard interest notice recording the relevant judgment day as 13 May 2021 and the stipulated rate of interest as 8%, but no separate interest sum was awarded in this decision.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The respondent did not dispute entitlement to £764.73 as wages properly due but unpaid. The tribunal ordered payment of that net sum as unlawfully deducted wages, without deduction of tax or national insurance. | Upheld | — | £765 |
| Breach of contract | The respondent's contention that the claimant was not entitled to one week's notice pay because she had not completed probation was struck out under rule 37(1) for having no reasonable prospects of success. The tribunal accepted the contract showed an annual salary of £16,000 and assessed a week's pay at £307.69 by dividing that salary by 52. | Upheld | — | £308 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,072
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37(1) Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure
- no reasonable prospects of success
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.