Case 2419548/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Dzydzan v Lunar Automotive Limited (in compulsory liquidation) — 2021
- Case reference
- 2419548/2020
- Decision date
- 9 December 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Slater
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Dzydzan
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningUpon the basis of admissions in the response, the tribunal entered judgment that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages by not paying wages at 80% of normal pay for the period 1 September 2020 to 16 December 2020 inclusive.
The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant the gross sum of £6,776.16. The judgment stated that complaints concerning deduction of employee pension contributions and underpayment for holiday taken during furlough would be dealt with by further judgment on paper or at a final hearing if any time limit or other outstanding issue remained.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Judgment was entered upon admissions in the response for unpaid wages at 80% of normal pay from 1 September 2020 to 16 December 2020 inclusive. Complaints about deduction of employee pension contributions and underpayment for holiday taken during furlough were reserved for further judgment or final hearing and are not treated as adjudicated in this judgment. | Upheld | — | £6,776 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,776
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.