Case 2419634/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Smallwood v Whiteline Taxi (Copeland) Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2419634/2020
- Decision date
- 31 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McCarthy
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Smallwood
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr J Smallwood presented his claim on 10 December 2020, bringing claims for constructive unfair dismissal and unlawful deductions from wages. Whiteline Taxi (Copeland) Ltd filed a response on 8 February 2021. The claim was listed for a two-day hearing on 6 and 7 January 2022, with notices and case management directions sent to the parties in March 2021 and a further notice sent on 20 December 2021 changing the hearing to CVP and asking for the hearing bundle and witness statements.
When the Employment Judge joined the hearing on 6 January 2022, neither party nor any representative was in attendance. The clerk confirmed that no bundle had been provided, there had been no contact from either party after the 20 December 2021 notice, and attempts to contact the claimant by phone and both parties by email did not produce a response. The Tribunal waited until 11.20am, but no one joined or replied.
Having considered Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013 and the information available about the parties' absence, the Judge decided not to proceed in the absence of the parties. The reasons state that the claimant's main claim was one of unfair constructive dismissal, that the burden was on him to prove dismissal, and that no evidence had been provided to support the claim. The absence of any bundle, including witness statements, was also noted.
The Tribunal dismissed the claim in full. No remedy or monetary award was made, and the judgment contains no merits findings on either the dismissal allegation or the unlawful deduction allegation.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | Claim was pleaded as constructive unfair dismissal. The Tribunal dismissed the claim under Rule 47 after neither party attended or was represented at the final hearing and no bundle or witness evidence had been provided. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed in full under Rule 47 for non-attendance. The Tribunal made no merits findings on the wage deduction allegation. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.