Case 2419887/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Sardari v MSoft e Solutions Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2419887/2020
- Decision date
- 2 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Leach Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S Sardari
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss S Sardari brought a claim against MSoft e Solutions Limited for an unauthorised deduction from wages. At the hearing on 1 March 2021 before Employment Judge Leach, the respondent name was amended to MSoft E Solutions Limited.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant’s wages in the sum of £419, contrary to section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The judgment records that the respondent was required to pay the claimant the whole of the deduction, being £419.
The written record also notes that the judge gave reasons orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested. The attached interest notice states the relevant decision day was 2 March 2021 and explains the standard tribunal interest position, but the judgment itself does not award a separate interest sum.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held that the respondent made an unauthorised deduction from wages of £419 contrary to section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996 and ordered repayment of the whole deduction. | Upheld | — | £419 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £419
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.