Case 2419913/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms E Liston v Tameside & Glossop Integrated NHS Care Foundation Trust — 2022
- Case reference
- 2419913/2020
- Decision date
- 28 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Holmes Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms E Liston
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 28 March 2022, the Tribunal gave Ms E Liston an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out because she had not complied with a Tribunal order and because the claim had not been actively pursued. Ms Liston did not make representations, or did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim. The judgment does not record any determination of the substantive merits of the pleaded complaint. It also records that the hearing listed for three days from 23 August 2023 would not take place.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment does not restate the pleaded allegations; it records only that 'the claim' was struck out after non-compliance with a Tribunal order and because it had not been actively pursued. The case listing identifies the matter as Disability Discrimination. | Struck out | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.