Case 2419927/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Alamin v Muller UK and Ireland LLP — 2021
- Case reference
- 2419927/2020
- Decision date
- 7 December 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Alamin
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the complaint of unfair dismissal. It recorded that, following a preliminary hearing, the claimant had been given an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why that complaint should not be struck out.
The reason given was that the claimant was not entitled to bring an unfair dismissal complaint unless he was employed by the named respondent, and at the preliminary hearing he had accepted that he was not employed by the named respondent. The Tribunal therefore stated that it did not have jurisdiction to hear that part of the claim.
The claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The judgment states that the remaining claims for race discrimination and/or harassment remained listed for hearing on 1 and 2 February 2022.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The unfair dismissal complaint was struck out because the Tribunal found it had no jurisdiction to hear that part of the claim, as the claimant had accepted he was not employed by the named respondent. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.