Case 2420047/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs P Jackson Miss J Lucas Mrs N Wilson Miss A Gautry v McCluskey Enterprises Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2420047/2020
- Decision date
- 22 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs P Jackson Miss J Lucas Mrs N Wilson Miss A Gautry
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Manchester by CVP on 18 March 2021 before Employment Judge Phil Allen. The respondent did not attend and was not represented. The tribunal gave its decision orally at the hearing, and the written record states that reasons would not be provided unless requested.
The tribunal found that Mrs P Jackson, Miss J Lucas, Mrs N Wilson and Miss A Gautry were each dismissed by reason of redundancy. No other claim type or issue is recorded in the judgment text provided.
Each claimant was found entitled to a redundancy payment in the amount set out in the judgment: £1,202.04 for Mrs P Jackson, £1,471.28 for Miss J Lucas, £1,743.36 for Mrs N Wilson, and £655.52 for Miss A Gautry. The bottom-line monetary award on the face of the judgment is the sum of those four redundancy payments, £5,072.20.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Mrs P Jackson was found to have been dismissed by reason of redundancy and was awarded a redundancy payment of £1,202.04. | Upheld | — | £1,202 |
| Redundancy | Miss J Lucas was found to have been dismissed by reason of redundancy and was awarded a redundancy payment of £1,471.28. | Upheld | — | £1,471 |
| Redundancy | Mrs N Wilson was found to have been dismissed by reason of redundancy and was awarded a redundancy payment of £1,743.36. | Upheld | — | £1,743 |
| Redundancy | Miss A Gautry was found to have been dismissed by reason of redundancy and was awarded a redundancy payment of £655.52. | Upheld | — | £656 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,072
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.